Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 outperforms the more expensive ASUS VivoBook Pro 14 OLED on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 43% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS VivoBook Pro 14 OLED - 293 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than ASUS VivoBook Pro 14 OLED - $899.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS VivoBook Pro 14 OLED - $3.07 vs $4.39 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
293
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Oct 10th, 2022
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Oct 10th, 2022
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
40%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Oct 10th, 2022
Ryzen 7 6800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1876
82%
Multi-Core
9010
84%
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS VivoBook Pro 14 OLED Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 6800H | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 14" |
