Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Up to 50% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $2019.0 vs $3999.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $8.86 vs $13.29 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 32% better in Forza Horizon 4 than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - 301 vs 228 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FPS
228
75.74750830564784%
Value, $/FPS
$8.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2019
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32375 minutes ago
Jan 8th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
FPS
301
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.29/FPS
66.66666666666666%
Price, $
$3999
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Jan 8th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
47.797681770284505%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
35.20279448864739%
Jan 8th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
