Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper Asus FX504 TUF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 1100% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Asus FX504 TUF - 72 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 78% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Asus FX504 TUF - $28.04 vs $128.33 per FPS
Advantages of Asus FX504 TUF Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $769.99 vs $2019.0
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$28.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2019
38%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32787 minutes ago
Jun 19th, 2018
FPS
6
8.333333333333332%
Value, $/FPS
$128.33/FPS
21.849918179692978%
Price, $
$769.99
100%
Buy for $769.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jun 19th, 2018
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
51.84 GPixel/s
57.14285714285715%
Texel Fillrate
77.76 GTexel/s
42.86659316427784%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jun 19th, 2018
Core i7-8750H
null-core
Single-Core
1297
47.78924097273397%
Multi-Core
4609
28.059174479483744%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | Asus FX504 TUF Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-8750H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
