Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook K3605V 2023 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K3605V 2023 Laptop
- Performs up to 18% better in Dead Space than Asus TUF A16 - 73 vs 62 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 23% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K3605V 2023 - $1140.99 vs $1479.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dead Space than ASUS Vivobook K3605V 2023 - $18.4 vs $20.26 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.26/FPS
90.8193484698914%
Price, $
$1479
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27162 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
62
84.93150684931507%
Value, $/FPS
$18.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1140.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
64.43181818181817%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
73.62012987012987%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700
null-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
74.62006079027356%
Multi-Core
9281
62.88366420489193%
ASUS Vivobook K3605V 2023 Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon RX 7600S |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
