Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop
- Performs up to 70% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Asus TUF A16 - 39 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Asus TUF A16 - $25.22 vs $35.17 per FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 18% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED - $809.0 vs $983.65
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
May 3rd, 2023
FPS
39
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$983.65
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $983.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
23
58.97435897435898%
Value, $/FPS
$35.17/FPS
71.70884276371908%
Price, $
$809
100%
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
May 3rd, 2023
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 3rd, 2023
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
72.36551215917466%
Multi-Core
9281
56.501887251917694%
ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
May 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |