Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Up to 36% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $899.0 vs $1399.0
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 128% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF - 98 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF - $14.28 vs $20.91 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
FPS
43
43.87755102040816%
Value, $/FPS
$20.91/FPS
68.29268292682926%
Price, $
$899
100%
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27489 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
64%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
84.12698412698411%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
84.12348401323042%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i7-10870H
null-core
Single-Core
1433
58.016194331983804%
Multi-Core
6094
52.416996387407536%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10870H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
