Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Laptop
- Up to 18% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD - $1099.0 vs $1339.0
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop
- Performs up to 3600% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS TUF F17 - 37 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 97% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS TUF F17 - $36.19 vs $1099.0 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
FPS
37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$36.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1339
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i5-11400H
2.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1818
69%
Multi-Core
6333
42%
ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-11400H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
