Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop
- Performs up to 64% better in Dead Space than ASUS TUF F17 - 74 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than ASUS TUF F17 - $983.65 vs $1259.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dead Space than ASUS TUF F17 - $13.29 vs $27.98 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
45
60.810810810810814%
Value, $/FPS
$27.98/FPS
47.49821300929235%
Price, $
$1259
78%
Buy for $1,259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31358 minutes ago
May 3rd, 2023
FPS
74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$983.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $983.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
May 3rd, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
May 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-11400H
null-core
Single-Core
1818
66.98599852616066%
Multi-Core
6333
38.554730305613056%
May 3rd, 2023
Core i9-13900
null-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 3rd, 2023 |
| Core i5-11400H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
