Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 66% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than ASUS TUF F17 - 58 vs 35 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than ASUS TUF F17 - $809.0 vs $1259.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than ASUS TUF F17 - $13.95 vs $35.97 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
FPS
35
60.3448275862069%
Value, $/FPS
$35.97/FPS
38.78231859883236%
Price, $
$1259
64%
Buy for $1,259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31739 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31742 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-11400H
null-core
Single-Core
1818
92.56619144602851%
Multi-Core
6333
68.23618144596487%
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-11400H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |