Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP Omen 16 Premium on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than HP Omen 16 Premium - 87 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than HP Omen 16 Premium - $1225.0 vs $1299.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than HP Omen 16 Premium - $14.08 vs $15.46 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61699 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
84
96.55172413793103%
Value, $/FPS
$15.46/FPS
91.07373868046571%
Price, $
$1299
94%
Buy for $1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 479764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
79.41771128184392%
Multi-Core
9281
71.15148727384238%
3rd Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | HP Omen 16 Premium Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-12900 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
