Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS Q540VJ - 78 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS Q540VJ - $15.74 vs $17.91 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 2% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $1199.99 vs $1227.99
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
9th Variation
FPS
78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1227.99
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,227.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75103 minutes ago
FPS
67
85.8974358974359%
Value, $/FPS
$17.91/FPS
87.88386376326075%
Price, $
$1199.99
100%
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
30.028409090909093%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.455357142857146%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
72.36551215917466%
Multi-Core
9281
56.501887251917694%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
