Key Differences
In short — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 - 132 vs 130 FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 39% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $899.0 vs $1479.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Asus TUF A16 - $6.92 vs $11.2 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.2/FPS
62%
Price, $
$1479
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
130
98%
Value, $/FPS
$6.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
69%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14" |
