Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF F15 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF A16 - 104 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $1295.0 vs $1399.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF A16 - $12.45 vs $14.28 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
FPS
98
94.23076923076923%
Value, $/FPS
$14.28/FPS
87.18487394957984%
Price, $
$1399
92%
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73827 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73848 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
92.83400809716599%
Multi-Core
10780
92.72320660588336%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
