Key Differences
In short — MSI Katana A15 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 29% cheaper than MSI Katana A15 - $882.0 vs $1249.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing No Man's Sky than MSI Katana A15 - $7.74 vs $9.12 per FPS
Advantages of MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Asus TUF A16 - 137 vs 114 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
13th Variation
FPS
114
83.21167883211679%
Value, $/FPS
$7.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$882
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $882 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74021 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.12/FPS
84.86842105263159%
Price, $
$1249
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
13th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
79.41771128184392%
Multi-Core
9281
71.15148727384238%
5th Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-12900 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
