Key Differences
In short — MSI GE68HX Raider 16" 144Hz FHD+ outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 34% cheaper than MSI GE68HX Raider 16" 144Hz FHD+ - $1087.99 vs $1649.00
- Up to 0% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MSI GE68HX Raider 16" 144Hz FHD+ - $4.12 vs $4.14 per FPS
Advantages of MSI GE68HX Raider 16" 144Hz FHD+ Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 51% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Asus TUF A16 - 398 vs 264 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $1,087.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
398
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1649
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
10th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
70%
Multi-Core
9281
56%
4th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI GE68HX Raider 16" 144Hz FHD+ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
