Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 22% better in Dead Space than ASUS Q540VJ - 66 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than ASUS Q540VJ - $989.0 vs $1199.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dead Space than ASUS Q540VJ - $14.98 vs $22.22 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
FPS
66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$989
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74613 minutes ago
FPS
54
81.81818181818183%
Value, $/FPS
$22.22/FPS
67.41674167416743%
Price, $
$1199.99
82%
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
72.36551215917466%
Multi-Core
9281
56.501887251917694%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |