Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper ACER Nitro 5 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 53% better in Death Stranding than ACER Nitro 5 - 116 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Death Stranding than ACER Nitro 5 - $8.18 vs $11.83 per FPS
Advantages of ACER Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 5% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $899.0 vs $949.0
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
11th Variation
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1551 minutes ago
23rd Variation
FPS
76
65.51724137931035%
Value, $/FPS
$11.83/FPS
69.1462383770076%
Price, $
$899
100%
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1556 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
11th Variation
23rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
23rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
23rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
96.74134419551935%
Multi-Core
7887
84.98006680314622%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | ACER Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
