Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper MSI Thin 15 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 26% better in Counter-Strike 2 than MSI Thin 15 - 264 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MSI Thin 15 - $3.64 vs $3.87 per FPS
Advantages of MSI Thin 15 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 16% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 (2024) - $809.0 vs $960.99
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
264
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$960.99
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $960.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31410 minutes ago
FPS
209
79.16666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
94.05684754521964%
Price, $
$809
100%
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Thin 15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
