Key Differences
In short — MSI Raider 18 HX outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 (2024) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 (2024) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Up to 73% cheaper than MSI Raider 18 HX - $880.0 vs $3288.03
- Up to 39% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than MSI Raider 18 HX - $19.13 vs $31.17 per FPS
Advantages of MSI Raider 18 HX Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 102% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than ASUS TUF A16 (2024) - 93 vs 46 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
46
49%
Value, $/FPS
$19.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$880
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $880 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for $3,288.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
47%
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
70%
Multi-Core
9281
56%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Raider 18 HX Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 18" |