Key Differences
In short — HP Omen 16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 (2024) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 (2024) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Up to 25% cheaper than HP Omen 16 - $894.99 vs $1199.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than HP Omen 16 - $13.77 vs $15.18 per FPS
Advantages of HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than ASUS TUF A16 (2024) - 79 vs 65 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
65
82.27848101265823%
Value, $/FPS
$13.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$894.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $894.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31458 minutes ago
43rd Variation
FPS
79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.18/FPS
90.71146245059289%
Price, $
$1199
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
43rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
43rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
72.36551215917466%
Multi-Core
9281
56.501887251917694%
43rd Variation
Core i9-13900
null-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16.1" |