Key Differences
In short — acer Nitro 5 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 (2024) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 (2024) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Up to 22% cheaper than acer Nitro 5 - $878.00 vs $1129.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing F1 22 than acer Nitro 5 - $6.81 vs $8.31 per FPS
Advantages of acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than ASUS TUF A16 (2024) - 136 vs 129 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
2nd Variation
FPS
129
95%
Value, $/FPS
$6.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$878
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $878 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.31/FPS
82%
Price, $
$1129.99
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
2nd Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
70%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 6800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1876
96%
Multi-Core
9010
97%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 6800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
