Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 48% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $1459.0 vs $2789.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $11.14 vs $13.68 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 56% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 - 204 vs 131 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
131
64.2156862745098%
Value, $/FPS
$11.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1459
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32837 minutes ago
Jan 8th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.68/FPS
81.43274853801171%
Price, $
$2789.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,789.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 8th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68.10810810810811%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
46.95832254724308%
Jan 8th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
