Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 - 99 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 - $1349.0 vs $1459.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 - $13.63 vs $15.52 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
94
94.94949494949495%
Value, $/FPS
$15.52/FPS
87.82216494845362%
Price, $
$1459
92%
Buy for $1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31947 minutes ago
Jan 16th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31695 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Jan 16th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
Jan 16th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 16th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i7-14650HX
null-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF FX507ZV-F15 Gaming Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2024 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
