Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF FX507 outperforms the cheaper HP Omen 16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing HP Omen 16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF FX507 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than HP Omen 16 - 94 vs 93 FPS
Advantages of HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 9% cheaper than ASUS TUF FX507 - $1499.0 vs $1649.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Deathloop than ASUS TUF FX507 - $16.12 vs $17.54 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.54/FPS
91.9042189281642%
Price, $
$1649
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62137 minutes ago
40th Variation
FPS
93
98.93617021276596%
Value, $/FPS
$16.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1499
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
40th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
40th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
84.48784082535003%
Multi-Core
10780
65.62766346036771%
40th Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF FX507 Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
