Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — HP Omen 16 outperforms the more expensive Asus TUF F17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 171% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Asus TUF F17 - 103 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Asus TUF F17 - $1429.0 vs $1559.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Asus TUF F17 - $13.87 vs $41.03 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
6th Variation
FPS
38
36.89320388349515%
Value, $/FPS
$41.03/FPS
33.804533268340236%
Price, $
$1559
91%
Buy for $1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65449 minutes ago
41st Variation
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1429
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
6th Variation
41st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
41st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-10870H
2.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1433
52.800294767870305%
Multi-Core
6094
37.09971995616706%
41st Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF F17 Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10870H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
