Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF F17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF F17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 29% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $1099.0 vs $1549.0
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 110% better in No Man's Sky than Asus TUF F17 - 126 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 33% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Asus TUF F17 - $12.29 vs $18.32 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
60
47.61904761904761%
Value, $/FPS
$18.32/FPS
67.08515283842794%
Price, $
$1099
100%
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40053 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-10870H
null-core
Single-Core
1433
58.016194331983804%
Multi-Core
6094
52.416996387407536%
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF F17 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10870H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
