Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — HP Omen 16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F15 2023 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than ASUS TUF F15 2023 - 79 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than ASUS TUF F15 2023 - $1199.0 vs $1399.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than ASUS TUF F15 2023 - $15.18 vs $18.65 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
75
94.9367088607595%
Value, $/FPS
$18.65/FPS
81.3941018766756%
Price, $
$1399
85%
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32139 minutes ago
43rd Variation
FPS
79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
43rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
43rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
84.48784082535003%
Multi-Core
10780
65.62766346036771%
43rd Variation
Core i9-13900
null-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 2023 Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
