Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI Katana A15 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 120% better in Battlefield 1 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 152 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $1099.0 vs $1109.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $7.23 vs $16.07 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
69
45.39473684210527%
Value, $/FPS
$16.07/FPS
44.99066583696329%
Price, $
$1109
99%
Buy for $1,109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1099
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
55.35786494136676%
Multi-Core
4008
30.726770929162832%
1st Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Core i9-12900 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
