Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 19% cheaper than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - $879.99 vs $1089.99
Advantages of ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop
- Performs up to 53% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 187 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $5.83 vs $7.21 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $879.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1089.99
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,089.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
5th Variation
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
78%
Multi-Core
4008
56%
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1749
100%
Multi-Core
7120
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Dec 13th, 2021 |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
