Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF63 Thin 11UC outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 74% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 47 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $721.0 vs $769.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $15.34 vs $28.48 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
FPS
27
57.446808510638306%
Value, $/FPS
$28.48/FPS
53.8623595505618%
Price, $
$769
93%
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$721
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $721 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87.21122112211222%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69.7710396039604%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
75.3025302530253%
Multi-Core
4008
63.28754144954998%
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
