Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI Katana GF76 outperforms the more expensive Asus TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 400% better in Starfield than Asus TUF F15 144Hz - 5 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Asus TUF F15 144Hz - $1029.0 vs $1099.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Starfield than Asus TUF F15 144Hz - $205.8 vs $1099.0 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
1
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1099/FPS
18.72611464968153%
Price, $
$1099
93%
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 325 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
5
100%
Value, $/FPS
$205.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1029
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87.21122112211222%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69.7710396039604%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
72.05263157894737%
Multi-Core
4008
50.817801445416514%
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
