Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive MALLRACE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF A16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 280% better in No Man's Sky than MALLRACE - 114 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than MALLRACE - $999.99 vs $1699.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing No Man's Sky than MALLRACE - $8.77 vs $56.67 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jul 30th, 2024
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141607 minutes ago
FPS
30
26.31578947368421%
Value, $/FPS
$56.67/FPS
15.475560261161107%
Price, $
$1699.99
58%
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jul 30th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 30th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
17.636684303350968%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
35.28114663726571%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 30th, 2024
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF A16 Gaming Laptop | vs | MALLRACE Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 30th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 5825U |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
