Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF63 Thin 11UC outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 74% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS - 47 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS - $764.0 vs $1179.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS - $16.26 vs $43.67 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9460 minutes ago
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$764
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $764 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
69%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |