Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS outperforms the cheaper NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Business on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Business is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Business - 47 vs 46 FPS
Advantages of NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Business Gaming Laptop
- Up to 49% cheaper than ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS - $799.00 vs $1569.00
- Up to 48% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS - $17.37 vs $33.38 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$33.38/FPS
52%
Price, $
$1569
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,569 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314843 minutes ago
FPS
46
98%
Value, $/FPS
$17.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
92%
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS TUF 17.3" 144Hz FHD (1920x1080) IPS Gaming Laptop | vs | NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Business Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4600H | CPU | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | Radeon 680M |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
