Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus ROG Strix G16 WQXGA 2560X1600 240Hz outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus ROG Strix G16 WQXGA 2560X1600 240Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 224% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ASUS TUF F15 - 81 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ASUS TUF F15 - $24.69 vs $35.16 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 56% cheaper than Asus ROG Strix G16 WQXGA 2560X1600 240Hz - $879.0 vs $1999.66
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1999.66
43%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,999.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53040 minutes ago
19th Variation
FPS
25
30.864197530864196%
Value, $/FPS
$35.16/FPS
70.22184300341297%
Price, $
$879
100%
Buy for $879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
19th Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
67.80870806566737%
Multi-Core
7887
47.75369338822959%
Asus ROG Strix G16 WQXGA 2560X1600 240Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
