Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Q540VJ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 52% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $1199.0 vs $2499.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing F1 22 than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $14.11 vs $16.77 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 75% better in F1 22 than ASUS Q540VJ - 149 vs 85 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
85
57.04697986577181%
Value, $/FPS
$14.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.77/FPS
84.13834227787717%
Price, $
$2499
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
51.96656833824975%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.714051618189266%
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
