Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Q540VJ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 72% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $1199.0 vs $4355.63
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $11.75 vs $18.94 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 125% better in Battlefield 1 than ASUS Q540VJ - 230 vs 102 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
102
44.34782608695652%
Value, $/FPS
$11.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024 • 5th Variation
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.94/FPS
62.03801478352692%
Price, $
$4355.63
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,355.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3988 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024 • 5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
22.276080084299263%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
13.128274791383662%
May 1st, 2024 • 5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024 • 5th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 4 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
