Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display,NVIDIA GeForce RTX4090 outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Q540VJ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 79% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display,NVIDIA GeForce RTX4090 - $1199.99 vs $5598.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing F1 22 than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display,NVIDIA GeForce RTX4090 - $14.12 vs $25.8 per FPS
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display,NVIDIA GeForce RTX4090 Laptop
- Performs up to 155% better in F1 22 than ASUS Q540VJ - 217 vs 85 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8279 minutes ago
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.8/FPS
54%
Price, $
$5598
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,598 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
13%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display,NVIDIA GeForce RTX4090 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Feb 8th, 2023 |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |