Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 45% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 - $1199.99 vs $2199.0
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
- Performs up to 125% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS Q540VJ - 151 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS Q540VJ - $14.56 vs $17.91 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
67
44.370860927152314%
Value, $/FPS
$17.91/FPS
81.29536571747627%
Price, $
$1199.99
100%
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75042 minutes ago
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2199
54%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
31.74174174174175%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
17.512296142894122%
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Feb 8th, 2023 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
