Key Differences
In short — Alienware m16 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 Thin 11UC on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI GF63 Thin 11UC is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware m16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 138% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI GF63 Thin 11UC - 112 vs 47 FPS
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop
- Up to 69% cheaper than Alienware m16 - $719.0 vs $2313.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Alienware m16 - $15.3 vs $20.66 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.66/FPS
74.05614714424009%
Price, $
$2313.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,313.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76494 minutes ago
FPS
47
41.964285714285715%
Value, $/FPS
$15.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$719
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $719 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
51.96656833824975%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.714051618189266%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
Alienware m16 Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Thin 11UC Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
