Key Differences
In short — Alienware m16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware m16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 14% better in Control than ASUS TUF A16 - 100 vs 88 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 33% cheaper than Alienware m16 - $1549.0 vs $2313.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing Control than Alienware m16 - $17.6 vs $23.14 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$23.14/FPS
76.05877268798618%
Price, $
$2313.99
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,313.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76656 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
88
88%
Value, $/FPS
$17.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76643 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
93.84498480243161%
Multi-Core
11626
78.77227454434582%
Alienware m16 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
