Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Alienware m16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Alienware m16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 137% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS TUF F17 - 142 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 32% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ASUS TUF F17 - $16.3 vs $23.82 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 38% cheaper than Alienware m16 - $1429.0 vs $2313.99
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2313.99
61%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,313.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7910 minutes ago
Buy for $1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
4th Variation
Core i7-10870H
2.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1433
54%
Multi-Core
6094
41%
Alienware m16 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i7-10870H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
