Key Differences
In short — Alienware M16 AMD outperforms Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Alienware M16 AMD Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 71% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Asus TUF A16 - 149 vs 87 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
May 24th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 1305 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
87
58%
Value, $/FPS
$9.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1306 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
May 24th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 24th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 24th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7845HX
3.0 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2648
100%
Multi-Core
13771
100%
CPU Winner
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
74%
Multi-Core
9281
67%
Alienware M16 AMD Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
May 24th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7845HX | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |