Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA outperforms the cheaper HP Victus on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1500% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than HP Victus - 16 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 93% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than HP Victus - $100.00 vs $1499.00 per FPS
Advantages of HP Victus Gaming Laptop
- Up to 6% cheaper than acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA - $1499.00 vs $1599.99
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
FPS
16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$100/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1599.99
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4608 minutes ago
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4626 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1749
73%
Multi-Core
7120
62%
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Victus Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
