Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 18% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Asus TUF A16 - 114 vs 97 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
11th Variation
FPS
97
85%
Value, $/FPS
$9.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$881.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $881.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 543 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
82%
Multi-Core
9281
81%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |