Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Acer Nitro 5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1430 days newer than Acer Nitro 5.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 87% better in F1 22 than Acer Nitro 5 - 148 vs 79 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Jun 1st, 2020 • 5th Variation
FPS
79
53%
Value, $/FPS
$10.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$849
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 446 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
Jun 1st, 2020 • 5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jun 1st, 2020 • 5th Variation
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
144 GTexel/s
59%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
100%
Multi-Core
12037
100%
CPU Winner
Jun 1st, 2020 • 5th Variation
Core i7-9750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1364
61%
Multi-Core
4996
42%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | Acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2020 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-9750H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 256 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
