Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 15.6" Full HD 144Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF F15 15.6" Full HD 144Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than ASUS TUF F15 15.6" Full HD 144Hz - 111 vs 100 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming F15 15.6" Full HD 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz - $699.0 vs $1849.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Ready or Not than Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz - $6.99 vs $16.66 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.66/FPS
41.95678271308523%
Price, $
$1849
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291131 minutes ago
FPS
100
90.09009009009009%
Value, $/FPS
$6.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
61.81286549707602%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
39.56140350877193%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming F15 15.6" Full HD 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i5-12500 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
