Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF F15 144Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 132% better in New World than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 58 vs 25 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 58% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz - $769.0 vs $1849.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing New World than Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz - $30.76 vs $31.88 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$31.88/FPS
96.48682559598495%
Price, $
$1849
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291137 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
25
43.103448275862064%
Value, $/FPS
$30.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$769
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55776 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
70.87719298245612%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
56.70175438596491%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-10300H
null-core
Single-Core
1369
72.05263157894737%
Multi-Core
4008
50.817801445416514%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE 16" 2560x1600 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |