Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive acer Predator Triton 500 SE - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than acer Predator Triton 500 SE - - 87 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than acer Predator Triton 500 SE - - $949.0 vs $1649.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than acer Predator Triton 500 SE - - $10.91 vs $23.23 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
71
81.60919540229885%
Value, $/FPS
$23.23/FPS
46.965131295738274%
Price, $
$1649
57%
Buy for $1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30234 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton 500 SE - Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
