Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-77P9 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED is 1036 days newer than the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-77P9.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-77P9 - 135 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-77P9 - $1588.34 vs $1679.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 22 than Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-77P9 - $11.77 vs $13.76 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
122
90%
Value, $/FPS
$13.76/FPS
85%
Price, $
$1679
94%
Buy for $1,679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4064 minutes ago
May 3rd, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1588.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,588.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 3rd, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
99.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
299.5 GTexel/s
100%
May 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
60%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 3rd, 2023
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-77P9 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2020 | Release Date | May 3rd, 2023 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
300 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
